Friday, May 23, 2014

"X-Men: Days of Future Past" | MOVIE REVIEW

It's better than the Avengers.

There's been a lot - and I mean a LOT - of superhero movies coming out lately (from Marvel, in particular), and a lot of them seem to have trouble setting themselves apart from one another. Iron Man 3 didn't really do the job for me and I was struggling to sit through Thor 2. While the recent DC movies (The Dark Knight Rises and Man of Steel) earned really high marks from me, I felt a lot of the new Marvel movies lacked something that the new DC movies did. Even on TV, DC has the better show.

Sure, The Avengers was an okay film, but, to me, it really isn't just more than a 'splosion-filled sh*tfest that was good for maybe the first couple of watches. Then it started to get old. To me, The Avengers lacked any real staying power - which is something only one of the new Marvel films actually has. That particular film was X-Men: First Class.

As a kid, I grew up watching the original X-Men and Spiderman trilogies, and so it really isn't much of a surprise that I'd be holding First Class in such high regard. It was a great film. Not exactly on the same level as The Dark Knight, but still pretty damn great. It was well-written, had a really great premise, had enough action to keep you glued to your seats, and it had a really great (as in, really, REALLY great) set of characters, and each of those characters felt human in their own way. The highlight of that movie was Magneto - who, in spite of his mutation, was a very human character with very human emotions and a very human motivation. You connect with characters like him. And that's what made X-Men: First Class different from, let's say, Iron Man or Thor. It's what made First Class better than Iron Man and Thor.

Once I got the hint that a sequel to First Class was in the works (thanks to that little scene at the end of Wolverine) and that the said sequel would feature the cast of the original X-Men trilogy AND the new X-Men (or should I say "old"?), I had one of the biggest nerdgasms one could possibly imagine (to put it into perspective, it's very similar to how I felt upon watching the trailer for The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey). When I saw the trailer for the very confusingly named X-Men: Days of Future Past, I, as stereotypical white girls do, couldn't even. I mean, how could I have even? My favorite childhood superheroes (minus Tobey Macguire, sadly) were banding together with the heroes from a superhero film I regard as one of the greatest. There was no way this could fail.

Did it?

ABSOLUTELY NOT.
If it did, we'd have a very angry blue monster man on our hands.

Days of Future Past is a refreshing break from the more light-hearted and brighter franchises like Thor and Iron Man, and the tonality of the film itself sets it apart from all other Marvel releases from the past two years. To sum up the plot, in the year 2023, the mutants (not just the X-Men) have all been wiped out by a bunch of robots called the Sentinels in a human effort to drive them into extinction... or should I say X-tinction? He he he... okay, fine, that joke sucked.

Anyway, the only way to defeat the Sentinels (who, by the way, were programmed from Mystique's DNA and now have magical adapting powers) is to stop them from ever being created, meaning they (and by "they", I really mean Wolverine because he's pretty much invincible and the only one physically capable of making such a trip) have to go back in time and convince Mr. Tumnus to get Katniss to not kill Tyrion Lannister.

Everything else that follows is a potential spoiler, so I won't go into detail about that. Needless to say, as confusing as the plot may be, it carries itself out quite well throughout the movie and really doesn't do any harm to the continuity of the original trilogy and First Class. It's a nice, strong plot that sails smoothly although it could take the average viewer some time to wrap his/her head around. But the real highlight of DoFP wasn't JUST the plot. It wasn't the action or the sex appeal, either (even if the movie did have Ellen Page). It was the characters.
Oh yeah; she's in the movie, too.

In spite of how many characters you had onscreen at the same time, it never felt too crowded or visually tiring. Each of the mutants felt equally important to the plot as the next one. Even Quicksilver, who has roughly ten or so minutes of actual screentime, was important to the plot. The characters were all carried out in the best ways possible. These characters weren't some invincible celebrity tag-team like the Avengers were. No. These characters were, in spite of their respective mutations, very human. You ended up connecting with these characters, even if they only had five or so lines. You cared for them, and they, in turn, kept you glued to the story. Bryan Singer made sure that each of the characters played an equally important role to the film, and he managed to pull it off.

What I like so much about the X-Men being very human characters is that you get to establish emotional connections with the characters. In recent years, only a handful of superhero movies have featured superheroes that actually felt human (The Dark Knight Rises and Man of Steel). But why is this so important? Well, it's so important because it shows us that superheroes can't do everything on their own, and that they're all human beings, just like us. It shows us that anyone can be a superhero, regardless of what powers they have. DoFP is no exception. The heroes and the villains are all driven by a very human emotion: fear. It's fear that drives Bolivar Trask to do what he does, it's fear that drives Magneto and Professor X to send Wolverine back in time. It's fear that keeps them all together.

It's probably also fear that keeps his awesome mustache together.

The acting in this film was superb and did nothing BUT compliment the portrayal of the characters. James McAvoy and Patrick Stewart present two VERY different sides to the much beloved Professor X, and Ian McKellen and Michael Fassbender both manage to fill each other's big shoes as they portrayed my favorite Marvel villain ever, Magneto. Even more minor roles like, let's say, Colossus and Iceman were all acted out very well. Even Booboo freaking Stewart (whose name alone makes me kinda nervous) managed to carry out his role with finesse.

And the character development. HOLY CRAP, the character development. It was visible. You could feel the characters grow. Past Professor X, for example, experiences a change in his world view as he's forced to let go of his fear of hearing all the voices inside everyone's heads. Mystique experiences a change of heart. Even Magneto, as stubborn as he is, grows smarter and more perceptive as a character. While there really isn't much character development to speak of as far as the mutants of the future are concerned, the mutants of the past is where most of the character growth (and very visible character growth, mind you) is at.
They also have a pretty awesome sense of fashion.
 
The technical aspects of the movie can't be ignored. Visually reminiscent of The Dark Knight, the movie isn't exactly what a lot of superhero movies are nowadays. The sets have a more natural look to them and hardly ever feel artificial. The movie is visually immersive, and feels distinctly X-Men. The darker lighting compliments the setting and overall premise of the movie. It gives you that feeling of despair and helplessness - it makes you feel what the mutants are feeling. It makes you feel as if you're actually in the movie.
The costumes and make-up all feel distinctly X-Men. Everything from Mystique's awesome blue skin to Beast's blue beastliness (Grimm should consider taking a page out of X-Men's book - just saying) even to Toad's various warts and his huge jaw, it all feels natural. While I do have nothing against CGI, I am a bit more partial to the more natural look of movies. Nothing in the movie looks too overly-CGI'ed, and nothing feels too overly artificial. Even the Sentinels (a.k.a. the badass plastic robots out to kill the mutants of the future) hardly ever seemed fake. The costumes and sets in the scenes that were supposed to take place in 1973 all felt historically accurate and really just immersed me into the movie. Visually, the movie looks better than the film it, without a doubt, risks being compared to - The Avengers.

The score might not be anything spectacular, but it does the job well enough. It sets the tone, which is what it should be doing.

The movie, inevitably, risks comparison to The Avengers due to its basic premise, which involves an all-star cast of superheroes uniting against a common enemy. However, it surpasses The Avengers in all aspects. It has characters viewers with connect with as human beings, there's an almost tangible sense of danger, and it has real staying power. Whether or not Age of Ultron would ever be better than DoFP (or at least match its level of intensity and overall depth), we will find out in the future. But, for now, I'll let Days of Future Past take its spot as the best film Marvel has to offer nowadays.

And that, Avengers, is how you make a superhero movie.
PROS: Wonderful set of characters, amazing character development, immersive, superb acting, brilliant sense of nostalgia
CONS: Nothing I can really think of.
OVERALL: 9 out of 10 (really freaking great!)

PHOTO CREDITS
 http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=115188#/slide/2

http://screenrant.com/x-men-days-future-past-images-blink-stryker-toad/

(C) Rafa Duran, The Galactic Deep-Fry, 2014
All rights reserved.

Saturday, May 17, 2014

Why the "Percy Jackson" Movies are Some of the Saddest Ever Made

I remember how excited I was when I first heard that someone bought the movie rights to the Percy Jackson series of books, which, at the time, were my favorite books. EVERYONE was reading them. In fact, those were the only books my friends and I were talking about back in first year highschool. I mean, it's about a kid who interacts with the Greek gods of yore and fights the monsters Hercules used to fight.

No! Get it away from me!
My friends and I were expecting a lot of things from the movie because, let's face it, it would've been tantamount to the second coming of the Harry Potter series itself. The books were written from a point of view with which nearly every kid and teen could relate. There was no way this movie could fail.

Then we saw the trailer for The Lightning Thief.

Or, as I like to call it, lady boners.
What the world got was a teen chick-flick with enough bad CGI monsters to make Moby Dick cry tears of joy. Absolutely NOTHING in the trailer paid any respect at all to the source material. It was as if everything that COULD go wrong WENT WRONG. The disappointment was so heavy, you could almost feel it. They got the whole character demographic mixed up. Instead of a lanky, curly-haired, acne-ridden, teenage version of Mr. Tumnus, we get that dude from Tropic Thunder. And, instead of a beautiful, young, BLONDE girl with GREY eyes, we get a brunette in her mid-freaking twenties.

Oh yeah... with BLUE eyes.
It was on that fateful visit to my friend's house that we ALL vowed to not waste any money on it at the theatre. Why would we? I mean, sure, it's just a trailer, but I didn't think Greek demigods would look like the stars of the next Twilight rip-off.

We concluded that the trailer was pretty bad and that the movie was gonna be a huge, flaming pile of, to be nice, s**t. We just didn't know HOW huge of a flaming pile of s**t it would be. So came the day when it was released on DVD. You could imagine my outrage.
This movie really should've been called 'Percy Jackson & The Crushed Dreams of Children and Fans Everywhere'.
I was so upset and so sad when I watched the movie that my own father kicked me out of the viewing room because my comments were borderline profane. I felt the way EVERY devoted fan of the Percy Jackson and the Olympians series felt. I was disgusted. I was outraged. I was betrayed.



How could I not have been? It was as if the director and writer themselves took a massive, fishy dump on the book and gave Rick Riordan the bird and went on to rape the series itself. They took everything that was good about the book and threw it out the window and replaced it with sex appeal and everything that would and could be found in your stereotypical teen fantasy flick.
I'm not even gonna go into detail about the second movie (which, by the way, should never have happened). I don't have to. I hated it, and I hated it pretty bad, but I didn't hate it as much as I did the first movie. Why? Well, with the second one, we were actually PROMISED and GUARANTEED to get a huge, flaming pile of money-grabbing, corporate, Hollywood, Twilight-ripping bullcrap. Sure, they raped Sea of Monsters and they changed an assload of characters into attractive young people in their early twenties and they freaking KILLED Tyson.


Michael Bay's Ninja Turtles have nothing on this abomination.
As much as they poured salt on the wound with Sea of Monsters, I could never hate it as much as I hated Lightning Thief. Why? Because Lightning Thief was, to me, the WORST movie adaptation (of a book, mind you) I have EVER seen in my life.

And it's sad. Not sad in the sense that it's a huge tear jerker like, let's say, Marley and Me or Click. It's sad because, at the helm of Lightning Thief, you had Chris Freaking Columbus. Who's he, you ask? Well, he's only the director of HARRY POTTER AND THE SORCERER'S STONE. He captured the magic of the Harry Potter books PERFECTLY and directed one of the greatest fantasy films ever made. Let that sink in.


"Logan, now we're gonna shoot the scene where you take your clothes off."
"Mr. Columbus, I'm afraid that's not in the book."
"It's a book?"
Still not sad? Watch Lightning Thief and watch Sorcerer's Stone. Is there a difference? Of course there's a difference. Sorcerer's Stone wasn't freaking about lady boners and Booty Sweat. It was about three awkward, underdog kids going on a near-impossible quest to stop the forces of evil. It was a movie about kids, for kids. It sparked a worldwide phenomenon that made people super stoked about the next movie. Parents were actually taking their children out to see these movies. Fans of the books were treated to something that did justice to the source material.

When I think about how the Percy Jackson movies could've been something just as good or even better - when I think about how they could've been the next Harry Potter - it does nothing but depress me. When I think of how completely alienated the entire fanbase felt, when I think of how painful it must've been for Rick Riordan to watch the movies, when I think of how large the feminine circle-jerk around Logan Lerman is just because of how "good" this movie was, when I think about how CHRIS COLUMBUS NEVER EVEN READ THE DAMN BOOK; it all does nothing but depress me.

How have adaptations of books come to this? How could we have come from the first Jurassic Park and the Lord of the Rings trilogy and the entire Harry Potter series to this? Is it really so important for directors to sacrifice artistic integrity and faithfulness to the source material for sex appeal and cash? And, with regards to Sea of Monsters, did the director not learn anything at all from the first movie? Are we going to keep letting this happen to our favorite books? "If you're so passionate about your books then why don't you make your own movies?" It's because I don't have the proper resources. Trust me, if a devoted enough fan did have the proper resources, you'd all be seeing a better Percy Jackson movie.
PHOTO CREDITS:
http://screencrave.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Percy-JAckson-and-the-Olympians-international-trailer-11-12-09-kc.jpg

http://ih1.redbubble.net/image.12352515.1382/flat,550x550,075,f.jpg

http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130401182027/olympians/images/c/c4/Tysonsom.png

http://www.movieinsider.com/m2153/percy-jackson-and-the-lightning-thief/photos/

http://www.imdb.com/

http://s3.amazonaws.com/data.tumblr.com/tumblr_kya3nokNqh1qb7z1ko1_1280.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAI6WLSGT7Y3ET7ADQ&Expires=1400400584&Signature=mTor4JmupNyKrnfrPDxjyl5SonA%3D#_=_

(c) Rafa Duran, 2014
 All rights reserved

Monday, May 12, 2014

"Exile" | FANTASY NOVEL SNEAK PEEK

The following is an excerpt from a fantasy novel I'm working on. The universe in which it takes place is one I've developed entirely on my own and I hope to post more details about it later. Anyway, this excerpt is taken from the prologue from the book that will serve as an introduction to the world itself as opposed to just the lore behind it. I hope you like it!

* * * * *

For the past two months or so, the North Wall had been restless. The mountain range that ran for hundreds of miles and formed natural barrier of earth, sediment, and wood had been teeming with Orcs, Goblins, and Trolls like never before. Stacattus stepped down from his horse and looked at the mountains from across the river. In the dead of night, he could see nothing, save the little splotches of light from Scourge campfires. He squinted, hoping to get a glimpse of the scouts he had sent out earlier, but found nothing. He could see nothing. It was as if the night sky itself had descended upon the mountains, covering them in darkness. He closed his eyes and let out a sigh of indifference. “It’s bloody dark for any man to see anything,” he grumbled, his deep, gruff voice only complimenting his frustration, “where are my damned scouts?!”

As if by coincidence, the sound of leather boots stomping on muddy ground filled his ears seconds later. He turned to where the noise was coming from and could vaguely make out the shapes of two Imperial soldiers, dimly lit by the small torches they were carrying. “Captain Stacattus,” said one, “there were far too many camps than we could make out, and we can only assume that there are just as many on the other side of the mountains.”

“And what of the skirmish from which that rider earlier said he had barely escaped?” Stacattus asked, “Did you find anything? Corpses?”

“We did, sir,” Camillus, the younger of the two scouts, reported, his face smeared with mud, “we found roughly fifty dead soldiers somewhere further up the river, could be more. A lot of them were found with arrows jutting out of their chest pieces, and a great deal of them were missing limbs. Several of the bodies appeared to have been crushed by some large animal; trolls, maybe. We believe the rest of the legion scattered and were all killed off one by one in various locations through the mountains.”

Stacattus furrowed his brow and looked to the mountains. “Do you suppose the entire garrison could face this horde head-on?” he asked.

The two scouts looked at one another and shook their heads. “There’s too many of them, captain,” the older one, Erebus, said, “our numbers wouldn’t even last us an hour against those savages. We need reinforcements.”

Stacattus let out a sigh of contempt. “So be it,” he said, spurring his horse to a slow canter, “come. Let’s get some rest. The sun should rise in a couple of hours.”

The scouts nodded as the rest of Stacattus’ ten-man company followed suit. They rode in almost total darkness; the only light they had came from the scouts’ torches, the moon, and several roadside lamps. Stacattus felt vulnerable. He rarely ever did. He had no need to. He was a captain of the Imperial Army. He had a hundred men at his command. He had been serving for twenty years. He had fought in countless wars and lived through countless battles. He had slain basilisks at Stygia and had fought hordes of Draugr during the Skandean War. He had witnessed the ritual sacrifice of two hundred children in Anglica. He had no reason to feel vulnerable tonight.

Yet, he did. Death was standing right at his doorstep. He was in dangerous country right in his homeland. All around him, he could hear the beating of Orcish war-drums and the cackling of Goblin assassins and the bellowing of Trolls. The North Wall was riddled with danger, and that danger lived off the fear of men. “Show no fear,” Stacattus commanded his company.

Camillus swallowed his spit. The lad was a fresh recruit and was barely fifteen. He was absolutely terrified. “Erebus,” he muttered, his voice shaky.

“Yes, Camillus?” Erebus replied.

“What do you suppose are the odds of all of us being murdered in our sleep tonight?”

Erebus’ eyes fogged up; Camillus could see it in the torchlight. “I’d say there’s a good chance of that happening,” Erebus said grimly, “but, if they come, I’m dragging them to hell with me.”

Wednesday, May 7, 2014

My 10 Favorite Upcoming Cars of the 2014/2015 Model Year

I like cars. It's not really much of a secret, and it doesn't have to be. I check three automotive news sites everyday, and, in my free time, I like to design my own cars either on paper or the video game Spore. Whenever my friends wanna figure out this interesting car they saw on the road, they talk to me. It's a passion, honestly, and it's an absurd one to keep since I don't even drive yet.

I wish I could drive... and afford this...


If you know me well enough, then you should know I tend to follow auto shows like a hawk that stalks its prey, except this hawk stalks its prey via websites like The Motor Report, Top Gear PH, and Motor Authority. In fact, if it weren't for the three aforementioned websites, I wouldn't know as much about cars as I do now.


And, since I like cars, I decided to come up with a list of the ten best-looking cars of the 2014/2015 model year/s. Now, I won't be including any cars that were unveiled in the first half of 2013, and I won't be talking about concept cars, either. The cars you are about to see here in this list are just the ten cars that I think look the best. It's all my personal opinion, so, if you don't agree or have your own list, leave your own opinions in the comments below (and PLEASE try and keep them respectful; there's a difference between disagreeing and being a douche).


10. 2015 Ford Focus


A Focus really worth desiring.


Honestly speaking, I never really found the recent Focus models to be all that attractive or appealing. Something about them just seemed too... odd, I guess? However, I am a huge fan of the 2013 Fusion (which they don't sell here in the Philippines, for some odd reason), and was more than happy to see Ford's new Kinetic styling language PROPERLY applied to the small car.


  Not like this mutated thing.


For some reason, the way the Kinetic style was applied to the Focus Electric left a lot to be desired. I, myself, found it even more odd-looking than the regular model. The sharp-edged headlamps of the 2012 Focus didn't really mix well with the trapezoidal grille, which, when placed on the Focus Electric, seemed too small. I never really looked at the Ford Focus as something I would buy.


At least, not until the 2015 update surfaced on the internet.


When the 2015 update surfaced on The Motor Report a month back, I was stunned. The designers did away with the sharp edges and awkward grille proportions and, instead, gave us something that looked like a proper addition to the new Ford line-up – in other words, the 2015 Focus dons the new company uniform well (VERY well, if I may say so myself). Kudos to the design team who came up with this.




09. 2015 Toyota Camry


A refreshing return to smooth lines and polished curves.

The Toyota Camry (in particular, every Camry model from 2002 – 2012) has always been one of my favorites. To me, I've always found it simple yet elegant at the same time. Like I've mentioned earlier, I wasn't entirely happy with the 2012 model update (mostly because I thought it looked somewhat like a carabao). For one reason or another, the designers completely did away with the smooth curves and polished lines of the previous model and went for something more aggressive-looking as opposed to sophisticated (since the Camry just so happens to be a status symbol here in the Philippines).


In short, it looks too boxy.


The boxy styling language might have worked on the Innova, Hilux, and the Fortuner, but on the Camry, it just made it look out of place and didn't work too well. I was sort of wondering when the Camry's designers would return to the fluid lines of the previous model. And, that's where the 2015 Camry comes in.

Verily, fluidity!

Now, when you're looking for a mid-size car, chances are you want something that looks more than what it's worth. In the Philippines, Camry's are priced near the million-and-a-half-mark, and, with that money, I'd want a car that doesn't look like a cow. The new Camry, in spite of looking like a Hyundai i40, is a refreshing return to the premium look of the previous model, which is one of my favorite models... EVER.




08. 2014 Dodge Charger


Mega-Dart? Nah... Think “.50 Caliber”.


Let me just first say this: the current Dodge Charger is my favorite full-size car. It's big, it's powerful, it's macho; it's Americana in a four-door fastback sedan. Think of a double cheeseburger with wheels. That's a Charger for you. However, I was honestly kind of nervous as to how the design team in charge of designing the next Charger facelift would handle the aesthetic of the big car, ESPECIALLY since a lot of MoPar's recent reveals haven't exactly been the nicest looking cars out there (the 2014 Jeep Cherokee, the 2013 RAM Powermaster, the 2014 Chrysler 200). On two instances (the other one, I will discuss in detail later), I was proven wrong.


Don't worry, Mr. Muscle. You're in good hands now.


It really didn't come as much of a surprise to me that the design team behind the 2015 Charger wanted to incorporate the company uniform, so to speak, into the brawny design of the four-door fastback, since just about every car company is doing it nowadays (some, without a doubt, do it better than others). In this case, it meant making the Charger resemble its younger brother the Dart (which is, to date, the most recent addition to the Dodge family). Did it work? To me, yes – and it worked marvelously. Although the Charger looks a bit more premium than muscular now, the new aesthetic certainly makes it stand out a lot better from the full-size sedan market.



It certainly looks like PhP 3.5 million now.


Given that a brand-new, fully-loaded Charger sells in the Philippines for near four million pesos, looking like an Audi A8's gym-nut cousin really helps making the car appear like it's worth the money. While some might not find the new Charger's look all too appealing, I, for one, find it refreshing. And it CERTAINLY looks a lot manlier than its competition.




07. 2015 Kia Carnival


For a family car, it looks pretty bad-ass.


Okay, I'll admit that there are several minivans that I really, really like (such as the U.S.-spec Honda Odyssey and the Toyota Sienna). Although it's been around for a long time, however, the Kia Carnival's never been one of my favorites. On the current model, I found the grille too small and its proportions a bit odd and, well, out of place. It reminded me of the Shaak from Star Wars.



(top, a 2012 Kia Carnival; bottom, a Shaak from Star Wars)
Coincidence? I think NOT!


With the 2015 model, however, it seems that, for the Carnival, at least, Kia's design team has stopped taking design cues from Star Wars and, instead, has started working on making the Carnival (their largest model to date) look less alien and more in-line with the rest of their line-up. The 2015 Carnival (or Sedona, if you're American) sports the new company uniform and a bulkier body that not only makes it more impressive physically, but also tells potential buyers, “Hey, look at me. I'll carry that family around for ya'! I'll carry it real nice.”


It actually looks really capable of doing just that.


The overhaul makes the Carnival look just as capable (if not more) than the rest of its competition, which, in the American minivan market, includes the Honda Odyssey, the Toyota Sienna, the Dodge Grand Caravan, among others. And, in a minivan, capability is something any potential buyer should REALLY look for. In the case of the 2015 Carnival, it not only looks capable, but upmarket and premium, as well.


06. 2015 Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban



Who needs the Kardashians when you've got THESE beautiful siblings?


Now, before you start accusing me of wanting to compensate for something, let me first get this out of the way. It's part of Filipino car culture to want a big, powerful, solid wagon in your garage, and the full-size SUV market in this country is, as you probably wouldn't expect, very, VERY competitive. Although a lot of them tend to be poorly driven and notorious for being politician-movers, it's impossible to not be impressed by their size (they are MASSIVE). Apart from that, full-size, truck-based wagons such as the Tahoe and the Suburban are status symbols. A Tahoe alone costs almost PhP 3.5 million while the Suburban costs almost half a million more.



And what better way to flaunt your wealth on the streets of EDSA than cruising around in this?


As much as I do like the Tahoe and Suburban, I really couldn't help but feel that they look a little too... what's the word... soft (?) or tame. That isn't entirely a bad thing. It's just that, given the sheer size of the vehicle, you'd want something that looks like it can eat you alive. You'd want something that looks bad-ass. Take the Toyota Sequoia, for example. It looks like a grizzly bear – something that will eat you alive. If full-size SUV's were animals, the Sequoia would definitely at the top of the food chain. I was sort of waiting on Chevrolet to deliver on my unsaid request for an SUV that looked just as monstrous as the new Silverado.



And, boy, did they deliver.


I really couldn't help but fall in love with this T-Rex of an SUV and its much longer sister (wipe that grin off your face). With a considerably larger grille and a more menacing set of headlamps, the new Tahoe and the new Suburban both have a more aggressive look to them, which only compliments their immense size. And, remember how I mentioned earlier that there are some trucks and SUV's that take styling cues from smaller cars such as sedans? In this case, there are some obvious styling cues in the aesthetic of the 2015 Tahoe and Suburban that were taken from the 2014 Chevy Impala (which, by the way, is a very beautiful car), such as the design of the grille and the headlamps. Did borrowing styling cues from a much smaller car work for such a monstrously large car? Why, yes.


 

05. 2015 Cadillac Escalade


Because, sometimes, I wanna feel like a pimp.


While many environmentalists would often cringe at the thought of buying a large SUV, one can't help but feel intimidated by the sheer size of the Cadillac Escalade. Its presence is almost tangible. Whenever I see one on the streets, my first instinct would be to look in its direction. The Escalade is a symbol of not just luxury, but of the posh lifestyle that comes with being able to afford such a vehicle. Plus, carrying that Cadillac badge doesn't hurt its being a status symbol either. For years, the Escalade has managed to preserve that look.



Can't you see how happy it is being synonymous with the word “wealthy”?


People, especially Americans, love driving around in big Cadillacs. Over the years, the definition of exactly what a “big Cadillac” was changed. While it can be agreed by many that a true and blue “big Cadillac” is a really big sedan like the Sixty Special's of, well, the 60's, the Escalade is, nowadays, a BIG Cadillac; it's THE big Cadillac. It's a universal symbol of luxury that offers size, practicality, and presence with a price tag shy of $90K.



Although, I'd be REALLY interested in buying it if it was free.


The 2015 Cadillac Escalade features the most recent interpretation of Cadillac's trademark Art and Science design philosophy (which, honestly, doesn't look the best on some cars), which can also be seen on the 2014 Cadillac CTS and ATS, as well as the uber-beautiful Elmiraj concept car. Does it work? Yes. While many people would argue that the “one design fits all” philosophy is a bad thing as it makes a lot of cars look plain boring and/or ugly, I tend to look at it as a way for car designers (and those who like to design cars as a hobby, such as myself) to explore their versatility and challenge themselves with making the company look, well, look good on any given car. The 2015 Escalade's designers did just that, and produced an SUV whose presence is tangible.




04. 2015 Chevrolet Colorado 
Game on? Game on. 
In the Philippines, Chevrolet's sales revolve PREDOMINANTLY around three models: the Cruze, the TrailBlazer SUV, and, the workhorse in their lineup, the Colorado pick-up truck. The current model of the Colorado (the one sold locally) was unveiled in 2011 and officially went on sale in 2012. The model found popularity in countries such as the Philippines and Australia (where it is sold with a Holden badge on it as opposed to a Chevrolet badge). To many Filipinos, the introduction of the Colorado (and its SUV platform-mate, the TrailBlazer) was a refresh from all the small cars we've been getting (the Cruze and Sonic) and was a great way to balance out their product range since there really wasn't anything to fill the MASSIVE price gap between the Captiva and the Camaro.
 And it certainly looks better than everything else in the pick-up segment... except its number one rival...
While it certainly does look good and has a reputation for reliability (thanks to it being platform-mates with a certain pick-up called the Isuzu D-Max), it isn't sold in, arguably, the largest pick-up truck market in the world: the United States. Why? Well, the small pick-up truck market is all but dead, with the only small pick-ups being sold there being the Toyota Tacoma and the Nissan Navara. The demand for small trucks in the US is overshadowed by the overwhelming cries for larger pick-ups. GM, however, decided to take a gamble and breathe some new life into a dead segment. And it did so in style.
And why would you ever need to buy a Tacoma when you have this? 
Taking styling cues from the new Silverado and the new Impala and putting them together to make a smoothie of Chevy-greatness, the designers of the 2015 Colorado certainly did a good job of creating a small truck that doesn't look old (the current Nissan Navara's been around since 2007). The end product was a desirable small truck in a market that's been dead for nearly three years now. Will this gamble pay off? Only time can tell. In the meantime, though, let's hope the new Colorado's styling and specs will benefit it in the long run.

03. 2015 Ford F-150 
 Because America, that's why. 
Now, in case you haven't noticed, I have a lot of utes on this list. Why? Well, because I like utes, and a lot of utes look great. The Ford F-150 is no exception (except, maybe the 2004 - 2008 models, but that's probably just a matter of personal taste). The (rather disputable) king of American pick-up trucks is a car with a history that can be traced back to the 40's, and it's been a sales-hungry monster ever since. The F-150 sold just over 750,000 models in 2013 alone, topping the previous year's sales record by a good 120,000. The outgoing model has built a reputation on reliability and toughness, but it's also growing a bit old in spite of constant updates each year.
Like this F-150 Tremor, which packs an EcoBoost 3.5L v6 (you know, to increase fuel efficiency). 
The 2015 model takes styling cues - scratch that - it looks JUST LIKE the Atlas concept from 2012. That's not entirely a bad thing. In fact, it gives the 2015 F-150 a more rugged look, yet at the same time makes it look a bit more elegant and formal - kinda like those villainous goons you can find in comics (you know, those bald, buff dudes in porkpie hats and tuxedos and carry Tommy guns with 'em all the freaking time?) or Triple H when he's not rockin' those black briefs. The 2015 F-150 is also FREAKING HUGE.
 "With this massive truck, no one's gonna have to know I have a three-inch dong!"
Okay, so showing off isn't exactly what full-size utes are for, but who cares, right? Well, Ford does, and they decided to add a lot, and I mean A LOT, more practicality into this truck. The 2015 F-150 is built on a chassis made of military-grade aluminum and high-strength steel. In layman's terms, it's built to kick ass and haul ass. That fact, combined with claims that it's gonna be the most fuel-efficient full-size ute ever made AND the fact that it's got a consistent sales record and is the best-selling truck in the US (and has been for the past how many years), is gonna translate into only one thing: this truck will be a massive sales juggernaut.
 
 
 02. 2014 Mercedes-Benz C-Class

Because the more affordable three-pointed star deserves a spotlight.
As far as German luxury cars go, I've never truly taken a liking to most of Mercedes-Benz's line-up. Sure, they've been praised everywhere for being stylish and for taking luxury to the next level, but to me, something just didn't seem too right about the way some of them looked. The S-Class' headlamps didn't quite appeal to me, and I wasn't exactly an entirely huge fan of the side profile, either. Sure, the car was huge, but its profile doesn't really imply that it is a huge car. The C-Class was the car I found to be the least attractive among its rivals the Audi A4 and the BMW 3-Series. I didn't really like how its headlamps overlapped the hood. It also kinda looked like it wanted to slip something into my drink.
"Rafa's never gonna know I made him wanna drive me."
Given that the only Benz's I liked were the E-Class, the G-Wagon, the GL-Class, the SL-Class, the SLK-Class, and the SLS, I didn't really pay much attention to the C-Class. In truth, I was always more excited about the 3-Series (and the new 4-Series). However, prior to the release of the 2015 C-Class, there was this little something called the 2014 S-Class, and it looked FAN-FREAKING-TASTIC. The new S-Class did away with the funny-looking headlamps and the lack of oomph and became something I'd consider buying (oh, wait, I can't - I'm a college student). When the new C-Class was revealed, I was pleasantly surprise that it looked just like a mini S-Class.
I mean, just look at that wonderful German booty.
The new C-Class looks just as premium as its bigger brothers, which is perhaps most evidently displayed in its new butt, which looks like a scaled-down version of the 2014 S-Class. Another brilliant example of the one-design-fits-all policy, the C-Class openly showcased an entirely new interpretation of an already proven formula. Hopefully, the other Germans take note (I'm looking at you, Audi) and start pushing out some great things of their own.
01. 2015 Ford Mustang & 2015 Dodge Challenger

 If you didn't see this coming, then you're probably not really my friend.
Absolutely EVERYONE who's at least spent an hour talking to me about my interests would know that I love American muscle cars. What can I say? They've got everything a European GT does, except the expensive price tag. Power, check. Size, check. Style, CHECK. American muscle cars wrap power, size, and style into a package that sells in the USDM for less than $40K (in Philippine money, that's expensive). While the market for these cars died out in the 80's following the mass extinction of GM's muscle cars due to the public demand for smaller, fuel-efficient cars (a demand brought upon by the skyrocketing of oil and gas prices), there is still a vibrant market for these cars today, and this market is being kept alive by three of the most iconic names in American car culture: the Camaro, the Challenger, and the Mustang. The rebirth of this market sort of started in the late 2000's when the folks over at Mopar decided that the Mustang has had it too good for too long.
 And so began the newest muscle car war.
The revival is also the reason that the Challenger and the Mustang have both received substantial cosmetic and mechanical updates for the coming model year, with the Mustang's being a complete overhaul while the Challenger's is a facelift.
I'll talk about the Challenger first. Modern muscle cars often draw design inspiration from previous models that have used that nameplate in the past (for example, the current Mustang is based on the 1969 model and the current Camaro is also based on the 1969 model). This is a particular car design trend known as "retro design". The 2015 Challenger is no exception to this. Why? Well, it's because the facelift is pretty much a carbon copy of a 1971 Challenger. Don't believe me?
See the resemblance?
To be perfectly honest, I was pretty anxious to see what would become of the Challenger since, like I mentioned earlier, the new Jeep Cherokee left an undeniably sour taste in my mouth. There was also talk of an "SRT Barracuda" that Chrysler was planning on making (which, from the renderings I've seen on the internet, does not do justice to the nameplate it bears). I was scared that the folks over at Mopar (now under Italian leadership, I might add) were gonna botch things up. Luckily for me, they didn't.
I am a happy spud. 
Now, let's talk about the Mustang, which is (arguably) the most controversial of all the cars I've mentioned here. People love it, people hate it. Those who hate it says it looks like a Fusion (come on, is that really such a bad thing?) and call it "fugly" and "ugly". They don't see the "Mustang" in the 2015 Mustang. I, on the other hand, do. Much like the outgoing model, the 2015 Mustang takes a lot of design cues from the Mustangs of 1969. The 2015 Mustang, however, also incorporates elements of Ford's current company uniform (such as the aggressive headlamps and, well, the aggressive headlamps). The end result is a perfect marriage of past and future.
 
If you seriously cannot see the resemblance, you probably need an eye exam.
I have been anxiously waiting for the 2015 Mustang for quite some time, especially since I was very, VERY fearful that Ford's design team would ruin it by turning into an Evos - or something much, MUCH worse. Its release also came to me as a surprise. I woke up one morning to get ready for class in the afternoon and just decided to Google "2015 Ford Mustang" and, BANG, I see an article on The Motor Report entitled "2015 Ford Mustang Revealed in Leaked Images". I was floored. All my fears of Ford ruining the Mustang were flushed down the drain. I was happy with the way it turned out. While it certainly does wear Ford's company uniform now, it still looks UNDENIABLY Mustang, and if that doesn't convince you the first time around, just get behind the wheel and drive it.
So that ends my list. If you've got your own, feel free to leave yours in the comments.

Images taken from The Motor Report, Motor Authority, and the following websites:

 http://www.macleanclassics.com/71hemichalmain14.jpg

http://www.barrett-jackson.com/staging/carlist/items/Fullsize/Cars/137860/137860_Front_3-4_Web.jpg

(c) Rafa Duran, 2014